Submit your public comment!

Non-GMO fine line food crop illustration

Interested in submitting a comment on the Non-GMO Project Standard? The Non-GMO Project welcomes comments at any time through our Public Comment form.

Read the standard

Public Comment Form

To learn about tips on crafting effective comments, please scroll past the form.

Please use our Contact Us page for matters not directly related to our official Standard Public Comment Form.

Please ensure all required fields are completed. Your submission is only confirmed if you see the "Thank You" confirmation message after submitting the form.

  1
  Basic Info

  2
  Public Comment

  3
  Submit

"*" indicates required fields

Basic info

Personal information*

First name Last name

Email*

Stakeholder information*

Stakeholder category

Company name*

Stakeholder Category

I currently have Products either enrolled in the Product Verification Program or Verified.

Other*

If you selected "Other" from Stakeholder Category, please describe your stakeholder category here.

Public comment

Please submit your comment below (max. 20,000 characters per comment - approx. 5 pages). You may submit multiple comments by submitting the form multiple times, attach documents for review, or both. For questions about the public comment process, contact us at standard@nongmoproject.org.

I would like my comments to remain anonymous.*

Yes

What is the purpose of your comment?

What type of edit are you proposing?

How important is this to you?

Tooltip: Recommend changes to enhance clarity, accuracy, or usability. Specify the section, explain the issue, and propose concrete improvements.

Tooltip: Suggest adding new material or topics not currently covered. Clearly state what’s missing, why it’s important, and how it improves the Standard.

Tooltip: Report mistakes, inconsistencies, or inaccuracies. Specify the issue, provide reasoning or evidence, and suggest corrections if possible.

Tooltip: Ask for further details to better understand the content. Identify what’s unclear, explain the confusion, and suggest how clarity can be improved.

Tooltip: Express concerns about the content. Clearly describe the issue and its impact, and, if possible, suggest ways to address it.

Tooltip: Highlight aspects of the content that work well. Explain why they are effective and how they contribute to the Standard’s clarity or usability.

Tooltip: Identify potential conflicts with external regulations or policies. Reference specific laws or guidelines, provide context, and explain the compliance risk.

Tooltip: Seek an exception to a specific requirement. Explain why the exception is needed, how it aligns with the Standard’s intent, and any mitigating factors.

Tooltip: Share relevant observations without suggesting changes, criticism, or praise. Provide context on why the observation is important.

Tooltip: Propose corrections to factual errors, technical inaccuracies, or incorrect details. Clearly identify the issue and suggest accurate revisions based on evidence or expertise.

Tooltip: Point out grammatical, punctuation, or formatting issues and recommend improvements to enhance readability and consistency.

Tooltip: Suggest edits to improve the presentation of ideas or concepts, making them easier to understand. Identify areas of confusion and propose clearer wording or structure.

Tooltip: Recommend changes to adjust the content’s relevance to its intended audience or context. Explain how to refine the focus or broaden applicability as needed.

Tooltip: Recommend changes to improve professionalism, consistency, or inclusivity in language. Identify areas where wording may be biased, unclear, or inconsistent with the Standard’s tone.

Tooltip: Explain why the proposed change should not be implemented. Provide reasoning to support your position and suggest alternatives if applicable.

Tooltip: Indicate that your comment does not suggest a specific text change, such as praise, observations, or general feedback. Use this when offering feedback without recommending edits.

Comment

Please indicate to which Standard section your comment applies

You may also submit comments in the form of a file attachment as well as attach documentation to support your comments (.pdf, .docx)

Drop files here or

Accepted file types: doc, docx, pdf, Max. file size: 50 MB, Max. files: 1.

Consent

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that your comments may be made public and that the Non-GMO Project has the right to reproduce and distribute them.

Consent*

I have read and agree to the Non-GMO Project’s Privacy Policy.

Email me with updates

Email me with updates on revisions to the Standard.

The Project may contact me for further information regarding my comment(s).*

Yes

Tips for Making Effective Comments

Explore available resources by reviewing Version 16.1 to understand the current Standard, Redline Draft 2 to see proposed edits and revisions, and the Context and Impacts page for background on key changes, related questions, and proposals.

Share a bit about yourself or remain anonymous by avoiding personal identifiers.

Use concise and respectful language when commenting. For clarity, refer to specific Standard sections and topics.

Share what matters most to you and explain why you support or do not support any proposed change(s).

Strengthen your comment with real-world examples, data or documentation when possible.

Resources

Request a hard copy

The Standards Committee

Learn About the Revision
Process